Adopted Child Stigma Alive and Well In Journalism
Blaming The Adopted Child, and/or Birth Parents
Adoptive Parent's Are Absolutely Free Of All Responsibility
This article is poorly written by a biased, negative reporter who keeps injecting personal opinions into the article. The facts are shady and the entire piece is only uses the adoptive mother's opinions and the writers repetitive suggestions of cutting ties with sons....Pathetic and leading.
When reading the narrative, at the start we realize vital pieces of the story are missing and the rational mind says there are four people involved yet we are only getting the view of one plus the utterances from the writer.
As the story unfolds, I see many problems by the simple and repetitive phrases of the mother, like an omission of guilt.
Three significant facts against the adoptive mother's credibility:
#1. the death of her son.
#2. the infertility, treatments and failure.
#3. That adoptive love can fix the boys.
#4. The assumed materialism as adoption benefit:
A. A large home
B. financial stability,
C. upper-middle-class neighborhood
We do not hear from the adoptive father,
the adopted son #1
and adopted son #2
or the biological mother
The bad reporting on adoption matters, vilifying and sanctifying persons without unbiased factual reporting is repulsive and liability in reporting, I hope the writer gets sued.